To Merge or Not to Merge: New York State Offering Increased Aid to Consolidating School Districts

To Merge or Not to Merge: New York State Offering Increased Aid to Consolidating School Districts

As of July 2024, school districts in New York State that reorganize—or merge—are eligible for financial assistance of up to 40 percent of the Total Foundation Aid Base under the Reorganization Incentive Operating Aid (RIOA) program. Unfrozen in the 2024-2025 state budget, RIOA is available to reorganized school districts for up to 14 years after merging, on a phase-out basis. New York State encourages consolidation for districts with small student populations as a solution to issues caused by low enrollment. Several districts in the state have already made the decision to merge, and more are considering the possibility.

The potential benefits of merging districts include cost savings, additional resources, expanded offerings for students, and upgraded facilities. However, many smaller districts are reluctant to merge due to concerns over loss of school identity, less individualized student attention, increased travel time, the potential for higher property taxes, and other possible consequences. In-depth studies evaluating the prospective benefits versus costs for school districts considering reorganization are necessary to determine the feasibility of potential mergers.

Potential Benefits of Merging

Cost Savings

Merging districts can result in reduced administrative and operational costs. Consolidating districts reduces the number of teachers and administrative staff required to operate the district, and fewer school buildings means less spending on utilities such as heat and electricity. Consolidating bussing systems can also help reduce transportation costs.

Additional Resources

A reorganized district benefits from the combined resources of both districts involved in the merger, including teaching staff, learning materials, and school equipment.

Expanded Programs

The funding provided through the RIOA program allows reorganized districts to develop and strengthen both academic and extracurricular programs. The new, larger districts may be able to hire more specialized instructors and offer a wider variety of educational programs. The funds can also be used to support non-academic programs such as athletics, clubs, and theater and music programs.

Facility Upgrades

RIOA funds can also be utilized to improve or renovate school buildings and grounds.

Concerns over Merging

Loss of School Identity

Communities faced with the possibility of a school district merger often fear that combining districts will lead to a loss of school identity. People may be reluctant to give up familiar school traditions, mascots, and the tight-knit communities they’ve become accustomed to.

Less Individualized Student Attention

Students, employees, and families in smaller school districts are accustomed to the personal qualities of a small school community, such as small class sizes, opportunities for parent involvement, easy access to teachers, and individualized student attention. A transition to a larger combined district may translate to a less personalized experience for students and families.

Longer Travel Time

When a merger occurs, students may need to travel further distances to school, increasing travel time and transportation costs.

Potential Increased Costs for Taxpayers

When two school districts merge, the new district may level up staff salaries and benefits to those of the higher-paying district, raising staffing costs. These higher staffing costs may result in higher property taxes for residents. Increased school transportation costs can also lead to higher taxes.

 

School district mergers present both potential advantages and disadvantages for communities in New York State, all of which should be considered by districts exploring the possibility of reorganizing. Merger feasibility studies should be conducted in order to thoroughly weigh the potential benefits versus costs for individual communities. For more information on school district reorganization, see NYSED’s Guide to the Reorganization of School Districts in New York State.

While you continue to act in the best interest of your school district, please know that RBT CPAs is here to support your district’s accounting, advisory, tax, and audit needs. Contact us to find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

How Do You Know If You Have a Good Fee Accountant?

How Do You Know If You Have a Good Fee Accountant?

A fee accountant is an external accountant hired by a Public Housing Authority on a contractual basis to handle the organization’s accounting responsibilities. The use of a fee accountant can improve the accuracy and efficiency of an Authority’s financial reporting, give the Authority access to specialized knowledge, and save the organization the expense of an in-house accounting team. But—not all fee accountants are created equal.

Below are some signs of a good fee accountant.

  1. Minimal (or zero) audit adjustments

One sign that your fee accountant is doing his/her job well is a lack of adjustments, posted or unposted, to the Authority’s audited financials. This indicates that the Authority’s financial data has been reported accurately and in compliance with regulations.

  1. Minimal errors in monthly financial reports

Another indicator of a good fee accountant is a lack of errors in the financial statements he/she prepares each month for the Board of Commissioners. Monthly financial reports are key to monitoring a PHA’s financial health; they should be accurate and submitted in a timely manner.

  1. Ability to meet deadlines and communicate about delays

Fee accountants need to meet several key deadlines including those regarding budget reports, monthly financial reports, and Financial Data Schedules. If delays occur, the accountant should communicate this information to the PHA.

  1. Understanding of HUD programs and compliance requirements

A good fee accountant understands the specific compliance requirements for HUD programs and keeps abreast of updates in industry regulations.

  1. Experience with PHA software programs

Your fee accountant should be familiar with the common software programs used in the management of Public Housing Authorities, such as MRI Software, Yardi, and PHA-Web.

  1. Audit preparation and readiness

Your fee accountant should have experience working with auditors and must be able to provide accurate supporting documentation to auditors in a timely manner. A fee accountant must ensure that the PHA’s books and records are audit-ready, meaning that all supporting documentation should reconcile to the trial balance before the auditor’s review. The auditor’s role is to verify accuracy, not to make adjustments. Any necessary corrections should be identified and addressed before the audit begins to ensure a smooth and efficient audit process.

  1. Communication and responsiveness

Is your fee accountant accessible and responsive when you reach out with questions or concerns? A good fee accountant maintains consistent communication with the Housing Authority as well as with auditors.

  1. Willingness and ability to help the Authority resolve issues

Finally, your fee accountant should be a helpful resource, identifying potential issues and opportunities in the PHA’s financial processes. A good fee accountant is committed to helping the PHA resolve deficiencies and other issues that arise.

As you can see, there is much more to the fee accountant role than merely completing accounting tasks. When it comes to accounting services, quality of service matters. Essential to maintaining the financial reputation and integrity of your PHA is a fee accountant who is reliable, effective, and well-versed in the specific requirements for HUD programs.

Our experts at RBT CPAs possess the specialized knowledge and skills to work with you on a per-service basis alongside your internal accounting resources or as your full-service accounting and tax department and advisor. When you partner with RBT CPAs, you can be confident in your program’s financial integrity and compliance, so you can continue to focus on your goal of providing decent and safe housing for our state’s residents. To learn more about how we can support your accounting, tax, audit, and advisory needs, visit our website or give us a call.

Is Your Municipality Audit-ready?

Is Your Municipality Audit-ready?

Financial statement audits are crucial to any organization’s financial health, and government entities are no exception. A financial statement audit provides an independent assessment of an organization’s financial statements, which in turn ensures transparency, accountability, and a strong foundation for future planning. Preparation is key to ensuring a smooth audit process and avoiding delays. Here are some ways municipalities can prepare for a financial statement audit.

  1. Create an audit committee.

An audit committee, made up of members of the governing body, oversees the audit process. The committee acts as the primary point of contact between the auditor, the governing board, and the appropriate staff or departments. The committee also reviews audit findings and assists in recommendations for improvement. The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) makes certain recommendations for the establishment of audit committees, which can be found under the “Best Practices” section of their website.

  1. Know the regulations and requirements.

The audit committee should be familiar with the various regulations governing financial reporting for municipalities. The Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) guidelines lay out the rules for financial reporting for government entities. This guidance is frequently updated, so municipalities must stay up to date with the latest updates and revisions to these standards.

  1. Understand the audit process.

The audit committee should understand the scope of the audit (what will be assessed), the timeline, and the roles and responsibilities of everyone involved. The audit committee should also understand that audit-ready means that all supporting documentation should reconcile to the trial balance before the auditor’s review. The auditor’s role is to verify accuracy, not to make adjustments. Any necessary corrections should be identified and addressed before the audit begins to ensure a smooth and efficient process.

 

  1. Gather all necessary documentation.

The municipality must request, collect, and organize documentation and information from the appropriate departments and staff, per the audit requirements. This includes general ledgers, detailed schedules of account balances, bank statements, invoices, receipts, payroll records, purchase orders, contracts, and other financial documents. The documentation should be easily accessible for the auditor, and all financial records should be reviewed for accuracy prior to an audit.

  1. Review internal controls.

Regular internal control assessments help to strengthen the mechanisms for preventing fraud and abuse within an organization. Internal controls include procedures for authorization, record keeping, reconciliations, and auditing. These processes must be periodically reviewed to ensure that they are achieving their objectives in preventing risk to the municipality.

  1. Review prior year’s audit findings.

Ensure that corrective actions have been taken for any deficiencies identified in the prior year’s audit. This will not only reduce the likelihood of repeated findings but also demonstrate your commitment to improving your financial management practices.

  1. Communicate with your auditor and prepare for questions.

It’s important to keep an open line of communication with your auditor, maintaining transparency throughout the audit process. Make sure you disclose any changes to your financial systems or operations. Be prepared to answer questions regarding your municipality’s financial procedures and processes, internal controls, documentation, operations, and personnel.

A financial statement audit can be a daunting and sometimes stressful event, but through preparation, the opportunity for error and disorganization can be reduced. Municipalities can follow the guidelines above to ensure the audit process runs as smoothly and efficiently as possible. If you have any questions about the audit process for municipalities—or if you need any other audit, accounting, tax, or advisory support, please know RBT CPAs is here for you. We’ve been proudly serving municipalities, businesses, non-profits, and individuals in the Hudson Valley for over 50 years. Please don’t hesitate to give us a call and find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

Comments and Reevaluation Requests Due for Fiscal Year 2025 Fair Market Rents (FMRs)

Comments and Reevaluation Requests Due for Fiscal Year 2025 Fair Market Rents (FMRs)

On August 14, HUD published Fiscal Year (FY2025) Fair Market Rents (FMRs), as well as a Federal Register notice, entitled “Fair Market Rents (FMRs) for the Housing Choice Voucher Program, Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program; and Other Programs; Fiscal Year 2025.” The notice provides details about the FMRs and instructions on how to submit comments or request a reevaluation.

The recently published FMRs take effect October 1, 2024. As explained in 2024 FMR FAQs, “FMRs are an estimate of the amount of money that would cover gross rents (rent and utility expenses) on 40 percent of the rental housing units in an area. FMRs are used in several HUD programs, including determining the maximum amount a Housing Choice Voucher will cover.”

The updated FMRs may result in changes to the rent level subsidies. For areas where FMRs are increasing, owners may be able to raise rents (within defined limits). On the other hand, for areas where FMRs are decreasing, owners may see tighter rent controls. Ultimately, this will impact residents’ costs for rent as well.

Mandatory Small Area FMR (SAMFR) use has been expanded to another 41 metropolitan areas, which are identified in the Federal Register notice.

According to the notice, comments are due before October 1 and requests for reevaluation of FMRs are due 30 days after the Federal Register notice was published (although some sources indicate HUD may accept reevaluation requests submitted before October 1).

The Federal Register notice includes details about how PHAs can submit comments or request a reevaluation. (Others who want to request a reevaluation should work through their local PHA.) Refer to the notice for complete details. Highlights include:

  • Reference Docket No. FR-6479-N-01 and the notice’s title: “Fair Market Rents for the Housing Choice Voucher Program, Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program, and Other Programs; Fiscal Year 2025.”
  • The PHA for the area or PHAs representing at least 50% of voucher tenants in an FMR area must agree reevaluation is necessary.
  • The requestor must provide HUD with more recent data than the 2022 ACS data used to calculate FY 2025 FMRs. Details are in section V.A.(2) of the Federal Register notice.
  • Indicate whether the FY 2024 FMR will be maintained or the FY 2025 FMR will be implemented during the reevaluation period. (Per the notice: PHAs requesting reevaluation of newly designated SAFMR areas may adopt FY 2024 SAFMRs or FY 2025 SAFMRs during the reevaluation period. Following the comment period, HUD will post a list, at https://www.huduser.gov/​portal/​datasets/​fmr.html, of the areas requesting reevaluations where FY 2024 FMRs remain in effect.)
  • Submit electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Submissions can also be made via mail, although electronic submissions are encouraged. The mailing address is Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500.

As you navigate the FY 2025 FMRs and what they may mean to your organization or tenants, you can count on RBT CPAs to focus on your accounting, audit, tax, and advisory needs. Give us a call to find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

 

RBT CPAs is proud to say 100% of its work is prepared in America. Our company does not offshore work, so you always know who is handling your organization’s confidential financial data.

Government Procurement Challenges, Priorities & Trends

Government Procurement Challenges, Priorities & Trends

Procurement is in the spotlight on global, federal, state, and local stages. Driven by rising costs, supply chain fragility, the beyond-fast evolution of technology, social and environmental concerns, ever-changing legislation, staffing challenges, and more, all levels of government are being challenged like never before to modernize procurement with a keen eye toward cost savings, sustainability, and compliance.

One survey identifies the complexity of systems and processes as the top procurement challenge across industries, with rising costs and preparing for unexpected challenges being the next two biggest challenges for government.

The National Association of State Procurement Officers (NASPO) defined top priorities for state procurement in 2024 as modernizing the procurement process (moving up from the fifth priority in 2023), continuous process improvement, talent management and succession planning, and more.

Cybersecurity, sourcing requirements, climate/sustainability, supplier diversity, and more are converging to put more demands on procurement. Agility to promote repeatable quality processes that offer flexibility, deliver results faster, incorporate user feedback, and respond to changing needs while addressing talent challenges and upholding the myriad of regulations appears to be central to addressing today’s procurement challenges.

E-procurement is taking the lead as a prominent trend, with municipalities increasingly adopting digital solutions for tendering, bidding, and contract management in an effort to shorten the procurement cycle, enhance transparency, reduce paperwork, and improve efficiency. At the same time, it promotes equal opportunities among suppliers to bid by providing greater access to information.

Sustainability is increasingly being embedded into procurement practices, with a focus on acquiring services and goods in a manner that protects and supports the environment, while promoting ethical practices and supporting social welfare. (New York’s Green Purchasing Community provides a framework for local governments to ensure purchasing has a lower environmental impact while earning points toward Climate Smart Communities Certification.)

Data analytics and artificial intelligence point to increased opportunities for municipalities to use data for insights on spending, performance, and market trends. AI can help detect fraud, improve decision-making, and automate processes, while predictive analytics improves forecasting and increases cost savings. According to NASPO, there may be ways for AI to help vet suppliers, track supplier performance, identify problem suppliers, and detect fraud.

Beyond technology, municipalities are looking to create job opportunities and drive economic growth with a greater focus on supporting small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) via their procurement processes. Some are adopting policies to award a percentage of contracts to SMBs while making bidding easier and providing assistance to help SMBs navigate the process.

As your municipality explores opportunities to modernize procurement while operating within New York State laws, you can count on RBT CPAs to focus on your accounting, audit, tax, and advisory needs. Give us a call to find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

 

RBT CPAs is proud to say 100% of its work is prepared in America. Our company does not offshore work, so you always know who is handling your organization’s confidential financial data.

What Municipalities Can Do to Prepare for the 2025 Budget Season

What Municipalities Can Do to Prepare for the 2025 Budget Season

With budget season around the corner, the following are some strategies and changes you may want to consider.

Rethinking How You Budget

While line-item budgets for municipalities served their purpose for a long time, in 2022 the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), and the National League of Cities (NLC) came together to explore modernizing local government budgeting to be more responsive to community needs, reflect today’s technological capabilities, and better align with the way the world works via their Rethinking Budgeting Initiative.

At the heart of the initiative is the transition from line-item budgets to priority- and program-based budgeting.

Priority-based budgeting puts community needs and requirements at the forefront of the municipality budget planning process. This approach offers the added benefits of having a budget that serves as a strategic plan and decision-making tool to ensure a community’s top priorities – for example, having a safe community where residents, workers, and businesses can thrive – are resourced appropriately.

Program-based budgeting defines the programs and services a municipality provides in a manner that’s more understandable and useful to residents. For example, showing the budget for police patrols is a lot more meaningful to residents than embedding those costs into line items for salaries, benefits, contractual services, etc.

At a time when inflation is stretching residents’ and municipality budgets, while demands for services and mandates increase, taking a new approach to budgeting may help promote community understanding, trust, and support when you need it most.

Minimum Wage and Exempt Threshold Changes

Pivoting from the strategic to tactical, we just want to provide a friendly reminder that 2025 wage and pay-related-benefit budgets will need to reflect January 1, 2025:

  • Minimum wage increase (of $.50/hour);
  • Higher NYS DOL thresholds for administrative and executive employees exempt from overtime (increasing from $58,458.40 to $60,405.80 in upper New York and from $62,400 to $64,350 in NYC, Westchester, and Long Island); and
  • Higher FLSA threshold (jumping from $43,888/year to $58,656/year) for professional employees exempt from overtime.

If during your budget or strategy development you need assistance, please know, RBT CPAs professionals are available to provide advisory, accounting, audit, and tax services, while our Visions Human Resources Services affiliate can help with all things people-related.

 

RBT CPAs is proud to say 100% of its work is prepared in America. Our company does not offshore work, so you always know who is handling your confidential financial data.

What Is Audit Readiness and Why Is It Important?

What Is Audit Readiness and Why Is It Important?

Audit readiness is crucial for all organizations, particularly for Public Housing Authorities (PHAs).

Essentially, it refers to the level of preparedness of an organization to engage in an audit process. This involves having all necessary documents and records organized, up-to-date, and easily accessible for auditors.

Owing to their responsibility of managing public funds and ensuring safe, decent, and affordable housing, PHAs are subject to stringent audits. Adequate audit readiness ensures that PHAs have accurate financial statements, comply with program requirements, and can demonstrate accountability and transparency in their operations.

The process of achieving audit readiness includes maintaining accurate financial records, implementing effective internal controls, and ensuring compliance with housing regulations and laws. Additionally, it involves regular internal audits, identifying potential areas of risk, and taking corrective actions. It also requires training staff on audit procedures and expectations to foster an audit-ready culture within the organization.

For a more detailed discussion on audit preparation, see Preparing for a Financial Audit: A Guide for PHAs.

However, if a PHA is not audit-ready, numerous problems can arise, which can significantly impact a PHA’s effectiveness and reputation. Below are some potential implications:

  1. Financial Discrepancies: Without proper record-keeping and internal controls, financial discrepancies may arise. This includes misallocation of funds, inaccurate financial reporting, and potential fraud. These discrepancies can result in financial loss, legal implications, and loss of public trust.
  2. Non-compliance: Audits for PHAs not only assess financial statements but also compliance with housing laws and regulations. Lack of audit readiness may reveal non-compliance with these laws, leading to penalties and possible loss of funding.
  3. Operational Inefficiencies: Poor audit readiness often reflects internal operational inefficiencies. This can lead to mismanagement, poor decision-making, and the inability to achieve organizational objectives.
  4. Damaged Reputation: A poor audit report can significantly damage a PHA’s reputation. This can result in a loss of public confidence and trust, making it harder for the authority to fulfill its mission.
  5. Increased Audit Costs: Not being prepared for an audit can lead to delays and prolonged audit engagements. This increases the cost of the audit and can strain a PHA’s resources.

Audit readiness is not an option but a necessity. It is a continuous process that requires commitment and diligence to help promote financial accuracy, operational efficiency, and organizational integrity. More importantly, it enables PHAs to retain public trust and continue serving communities by providing safe and affordable housing to those who need it the most.

Whether your PHA is looking for help becoming audit-ready or for an audit or accounting, tax, and advisory services, you can count on RBT CPAs. Let us know if you need more information, so we can show you how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

 

RBT CPAs never offshores work outside of the U.S. so you always know who is handling your financial information.

Managing an Unassigned Fund Balance: An Overview

Managing an Unassigned Fund Balance: An Overview

As part of a school district’s financial management, maintaining a reasonable unassigned fund balance provides a safety buffer for unforeseen expenses or revenue shortfalls. This is vital as it helps ensure adequate cash flow to cover the ongoing cost of operations. Managing these funds entails a strong understanding of their purpose, limits, and use.

To start, an unassigned fund balance is what remains after expenditures are paid. Unlike reserve funds that have specific purposes and requirements as set forth in law, an unassigned fund balance is not committed, assigned, or restricted in any way. This flexibility allows school administrators to use the funds where they are most needed, especially during periods of financial uncertainty.

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has set specific guidelines for maintaining and reporting fund balances into five classifications under GASB #54. It’s crucial for school districts to be aware of these guidelines and implement them effectively as they aim to ensure transparency, accountability, and fiscal responsibility in managing public funds.

One of the most important things to understand about unassigned fund balances is their purpose. They are not meant to be a source of ongoing funding for regular expenses. Instead, they are designed to meet unexpected or emergency costs, such as unforeseen repairs, unexpected increases in student enrollment, or sudden reductions in revenue.

Strategic planning and forecasting are vital tools in managing unassigned fund balances. School districts should have a clear understanding of their financial stability, including potential risks and opportunities, to ensure they maintain an appropriate fund balance level. This includes regular reviews of financial performance and adjusting the fund balance accordingly.

In New York, the maximum amount of unassigned fund balance at the end of the school year cannot be more than 4% of the following year’s budget. However, a 2019 report from the Office of the State Comptroller (OSC) indicated 60% of districts had unassigned fund balances higher than 4%.

While bills have been crafted to increase the 4% limit to 6% and to require greater transparency around unassigned fund balance, they haven’t made it past the initial stages.

For now, it’s important to be aware of the facts that having a healthy unassigned fund balance can be beneficial, but excessively large balances can draw public criticism for over-taxation or poor fiscal management and is against the law (Section 1318 of the Real Property Tax Law). It’s important to strike a balance by maintaining a fund balance size that is sufficient to handle unexpected costs but not excessively large to invite unnecessary scrutiny and undermine public trust.

In the presentation, “School District Fund Practices: The Law and the Reality,” these best practices were shared for school district officials:

  • Develop policies and procedures for fund balance and reserve funds.
  • Develop multiyear financial and capital plans.
  • Adopt budgets that reasonably reflect the district’s operating needs based on historical trends and other analyses.
  • If over 4%, develop a plan to reduce the unexpended surplus fund balance.

If you’d like to discuss or analyze your district’s unassigned fund balance, we’d be glad to help. You can always count on RBT CPAs for accounting, audit, tax, and advisory services. Give us a call to see how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

 

RBT CPAs never offshores work outside of the U.S., so you always know who is handling your financial information.

An Overview of Recertification Reviews

An Overview of Recertification Reviews

In April, HUD issued the 2024 income limits for HUD programs and Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Property, as well as an individual Fair Market Rent annual increase and income limit cap of 10%. As you become acquainted with the new limits, it’s also a good idea to review recertification requirements to ensure compliance.

Recertification helps protect the interests of property owners, tenants, and public housing programs by promoting fairness, transparency, and sustainability. To ensure an eligible household receives the appropriate level of assistance, a recertification takes place every 12 months. It involves a review of income, assets, expenses, and family composition.

For multi-family housing programs, owners are responsible for facilitating annual recertification; reviewing and verifying tenant information, and adjusting assistance payments or rent as required. For the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, overall responsibility for recertification rests with the local Public Housing Authority (PHA). Owners and tenants are responsible for providing timely information as required.

In addition to annual recertifications, there are interim recertifications. These occur to help adjust rent and subsidy amounts quickly if there’s a sudden change in income or household composition. So, if a tenant loses or gets a job, work hours are reduced, a tenant is injured and their ability to work is impacted, or a household member is added or removed, an interim recertification can occur.

Per the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA), owners must have policies detailing when a household must report a family income or compensation change. Any resulting interim recertification should occur within 30 days of an income decrease.

PHAs may consider establishing a checklist for Tenant Relations Assistants to ensure all recertification compliance requirements are met. The checklist should be signed or initialed by the representative and kept in the tenant’s file, serving as documentation that all compliance requirements were verified for the tenant.

Other ways to help promote compliance include conducting regular training on HUD requirements; conducting internal audits to review recertification processes and fix issues before they escalate; and considering whether compliance software can help manage recertifications by issuing alerts for upcoming recertifications, tracking key dates, automating calculations, and more.

Should you need assistance or have questions about conducting an internal audit of the recertification process, RBT CPAs can help. We can also support your accounting, tax, audit, and advisory needs. To learn how we can be better together, give us a call today.

RBT CPAs is proud to say 100% of its work is prepared in America. Our company does not offshore work, so you always know who is handling your confidential financial data.

 

Please Note: RBT CPAs is an accounting, audit, tax, and advisory services firm. Should you need legal advice on the recertification process, it is in your best interest to contact legal counsel.

Update on Safeguarding Tomorrow Revolving Loan Fund to Help Communities Adapt to Climate Change

Update on Safeguarding Tomorrow Revolving Loan Fund to Help Communities Adapt to Climate Change

Since 2021, we’ve been hearing about Safeguarding Tomorrow Revolving Loan Fund (RLF), a program designed to help communities address vulnerabilities to natural hazards and disasters attributed to climate change. Eligible communities in New York may benefit from the program starting later this year.

From February to April of 2023, states, eligible federally recognized tribes, territories, and the District of Columbia were invited to apply for the program. In September 2023, FEMA announced eight states will receive grants in the amount of $50 million combined to help communities address vulnerabilities to natural hazards and disasters. New York is slated to receive just over $6.2 million (it had requested just over $15 million).

As explained on the FEMA website, “Local governments may use capitalization grant funding through low-interest loans to make structures more resilient to natural hazards.” The website also notes funds can be applied to satisfy cost-share requirements for FEMA hazard mitigation (HM) assistance grants and will serve as a sustainable financing source because, as loans are paid back, funding can finance additional projects. The program promotes funding to disadvantaged communities, which should be slated to receive at least 40% of revolving fund loans.

New York’s Intended Use Plan, developed as part of its application for the Safeguarding Tomorrow RLF, provides more details and insights into how the program may work in our state. Here are a few highlights:

…“The state will use these capitalization grants to establish a revolving loan fund from which direct loans will be provided to local governments for projects and activities that mitigate the impacts of drought, intense heat, severe storms (including hurricanes, tornadoes, windstorms, cyclones, and severe winter storms), wildfires, floods, earthquakes, and other natural hazards.”

…“DHSES (a.k.a. NY Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Services) will administer the HM RLF to support various hazard mitigation activities that address natural hazards such as severe storms and wind events, and flooding. Flooding includes highwater levels, inland flooding, and storm surges. Loan applications will also be evaluated against the NY State Hazard Mitigation Plan.”

….“Standard loans will be issued with an interest rate of 1.0 percent. Loan term will be 20 year or less following completion of the funded project. Loans for low-income geographic areas or underserved communities will be issued with an interest rate of 1.0 percent. Loan term will be 30 year or less following completion of the funded project.”

…“The loan application and instructions will be posted to the DHSES website and will follow a similar process to an existing revolving loan program that DHSES currently administers.”

…“DHSES anticipates disbursing funds within 9 months of receiving funding from FEMA by working closely with all applicants.”  So, we’ll likely be hearing something by mid-year.

There’s more. At year-end 2023, the 2024 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Safeguarding Tomorrow through Ongoing Risk Mitigation Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) was announced, tripling the total amount of grants available to $150 million. The application period is open and will close on April 30, and New York is eligible to apply, which is likely according to the 2023 IUP.

For now, your municipality may want to keep all of this in mind as it develops local plans to address infrastructure vulnerabilities due to severe weather events and climate change. We will keep an eye out for more information for you.

In the meantime, if you need any accounting, tax, audit, or advisory support, please know RBT CPAs is here for you. We’ve been proudly serving municipalities, businesses, non-profits, and individuals in the Hudson Valley for over 50 years. Please don’t hesitate to give us a call and find out how we can be Remarkably Better Together.

 

RBT CPAs is proud to say 100% of its work is prepared in America. Our company does not offshore work, so you always know who is handling your confidential financial data.